Difference between revisions of "Titles - italicisation"

From Hull AWE
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''This page is one of a group on [[Typography of titles|how to present titles]].  You may also want to see [[titles - capitalisation|how to use CAPITAL letters in titles]].''
 
''This page is one of a group on [[Typography of titles|how to present titles]].  You may also want to see [[titles - capitalisation|how to use CAPITAL letters in titles]].''
  
When considering how to mark the title of a source in academic work (or, in any writing, to give the title of a published work), we divide them into two groups.  You can find our grouping [[Title - taxonomy|here]].  The two groups are marked as titls in different ways.
+
When considering how to mark the title of a source in academic work (or, in any writing, to give the title of a published work), we divide them into two groups.  You can find our grouping at [[Title - taxonomy]].  The two groups are marked as titles in different ways.
*The 'heavyweights' are ''italicised'', in our current conventions.  (For an older convention, click [[Title - italic or underlined|here]].)
+
*The 'heavyweights' are ''italicised'', in our current conventions.  (For an older convention, see [[Title - italic or underlined]].) Examples: ''Romeo & Juliet'', ''Das Kapital'' and ''The Origin of Species''.
*The 'lightweights' are enclosed within single [[inverted comma]]s ('  ') in AWE.
+
*The 'lightweights' are enclosed within single [[inverted comma]]s ('  ') in AWE.  This allows the distinction to be clear even inside a quotation.  Examples: "The chapter 'Airs and Graces' in Lynne Truss's book on punctuation, ''[[Eats, Shoots and Leaves]]''"¦ or "The song 'Voi che sapete' [the Italian song 'You who Know'] in Mozart's ''Figaro''"¦ or "Meron's article, 'The Geneva Conventions as Customary Law' in ''The American Journal of International Law''".
  
 
As the precise memberships of the two groups is largely a matter of judgement and taste, this Guide can only be that - a guide, whose advice you must take or leave.  In general, try to adapt your practice to a consistent view of what constitutes a long and what a short piece of work.  Over time, it will change; and there will always be borderline cases which will be disputed by [[pedant]]s.
 
As the precise memberships of the two groups is largely a matter of judgement and taste, this Guide can only be that - a guide, whose advice you must take or leave.  In general, try to adapt your practice to a consistent view of what constitutes a long and what a short piece of work.  Over time, it will change; and there will always be borderline cases which will be disputed by [[pedant]]s.
  
 
''You may also want to see [[Titles - capitalisation]].''
 
''You may also want to see [[Titles - capitalisation]].''
 +
 
'''<big>Be aware that different publishers and different academic departments and subjects have different rules for how to mark titles.  Follow the appropriate guidelines for your current purposes.'''</big>
 
'''<big>Be aware that different publishers and different academic departments and subjects have different rules for how to mark titles.  Follow the appropriate guidelines for your current purposes.'''</big>
[[category:punctuation]] [[category:typographical layout]] [[category:academic culture]] [[Category:Academic English]]  
+
[[category:titles]]
 +
[[category:punctuation]]  
 +
[[category:typographical layout]]  
 +
[[category:academic culture]]  
 +
[[Category:Academic English]]  
 
[[Category:Usage]]
 
[[Category:Usage]]
 +
[[Category:house styles]]

Latest revision as of 13:29, 4 December 2017

This page is one of a group on how to present titles. You may also want to see how to use CAPITAL letters in titles.

When considering how to mark the title of a source in academic work (or, in any writing, to give the title of a published work), we divide them into two groups. You can find our grouping at Title - taxonomy. The two groups are marked as titles in different ways.

  • The 'heavyweights' are italicised, in our current conventions. (For an older convention, see Title - italic or underlined.) Examples: Romeo & Juliet, Das Kapital and The Origin of Species.
  • The 'lightweights' are enclosed within single inverted commas (' ') in AWE. This allows the distinction to be clear even inside a quotation. Examples: "The chapter 'Airs and Graces' in Lynne Truss's book on punctuation, Eats, Shoots and Leaves"¦ or "The song 'Voi che sapete' [the Italian song 'You who Know'] in Mozart's Figaro"¦ or "Meron's article, 'The Geneva Conventions as Customary Law' in The American Journal of International Law".

As the precise memberships of the two groups is largely a matter of judgement and taste, this Guide can only be that - a guide, whose advice you must take or leave. In general, try to adapt your practice to a consistent view of what constitutes a long and what a short piece of work. Over time, it will change; and there will always be borderline cases which will be disputed by pedants.

You may also want to see Titles - capitalisation.

Be aware that different publishers and different academic departments and subjects have different rules for how to mark titles. Follow the appropriate guidelines for your current purposes.