Difference between revisions of "Encyclopaedia"

From Hull AWE
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: '''Encyclopaedia''' is the usual spelling in British English. In American English, it is spelled '''encyclopedia'''. The British spelling is more consistent, if not accurately so, with the...)
 
m
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Encyclopaedia''' is the usual spelling in British English. In American English, it is spelled '''encyclopedia'''. The British spelling is more consistent, if not accurately so, with the [[etymology]]: the word is from late [[Latin]] ''encyclopædia''. This in turn derives from the Greek ένκυκλοπαιδεíα, so should perhaps be rendered <strike>encyclop<big>ai</big>dia</strike>;. But it isn't.
+
'''Encyclopaedia''' is the usual spelling in British English. In American English, it is spelled '''encyclopedia'''. The British spelling is more consistent with the [[etymology]], if not accurately so: the word is from late [[Latin]] ''encyclopædia''. This in turn derives from the Greek έγκυκλοπαιδεία, so should perhaps be rendered <strike>encyclop<big>ai</big>dia</strike>;. But it isn't, either in British nor in American English. In American English, following [[Noah Webster|Webster]]'s reforms of spelling, it is always written '''encyclopedia''' with no internal '-a-'. (For more, see also [[Encyclopaedia (spelling)].)
  
 +
::'''''[[etymology|Etymological]] note''''': "an erroneous form (said to be a false reading) occurring in MSS. of Quintilian, Pliny, and Galen, for έγκυκλοπαιδεία '˜encyclical education', the circle of arts and sciences considered by the Greeks as essential to a liberal education" (''[[OED]]'', 1891).
  
 +
An '''encyclopaedia''' is a book, sometimes a single volume and sometimes of many vulumes, the aim of which is to supply a complete account of learning, either in general or of a specific branch of knowledge.
  
 +
Denis Diderot, (1713–84)
  
  
  
Dictionaries are "impoverished encyclopaedias" [[Eco, ???]]
 
  
an erroneous form (said to be a false reading) occurring in MSS. of Quintilian, Pliny, and Galen, for {elenis}{gamma}{kappa}{guacu}{kappa}{lambda}{iota}{omicron}{fsigma} {pi}{alpha}{iota}{delta}{epsilon}{giacu}{alpha} ‘encyclical education’, the circle of arts and sciences considered by the Greeks as essential to a liberal education
+
"It suffices to read some of the analyses of the current dictionaries and encyclopedias (see, for instance, Weinreich 1980; Rey-Debove 1971) to  realize  that, if so-called encyclopedias are in some way encyclopedic, so-called dictionaries are rather impoverished encyclopedias" (Eco, ''Semiotics  and the Philosophy of Language'', Indiana University Press, 1986).
 +
  
 
{{wip}}
 
{{wip}}
  
 
[[category:reference books]]
 
[[category:reference books]]
 +
[[Category:spelling]]
 +
[[Category:AmE]]

Latest revision as of 01:09, 13 October 2017

Encyclopaedia is the usual spelling in British English. In American English, it is spelled encyclopedia. The British spelling is more consistent with the etymology, if not accurately so: the word is from late Latin encyclopædia. This in turn derives from the Greek έγκυκλοπαιδεία, so should perhaps be rendered encyclopaidia;. But it isn't, either in British nor in American English. In American English, following Webster's reforms of spelling, it is always written encyclopedia with no internal '-a-'. (For more, see also [[Encyclopaedia (spelling)].)

Etymological note: "an erroneous form (said to be a false reading) occurring in MSS. of Quintilian, Pliny, and Galen, for έγκυκλοπαιδεία '˜encyclical education', the circle of arts and sciences considered by the Greeks as essential to a liberal education" (OED, 1891).

An encyclopaedia is a book, sometimes a single volume and sometimes of many vulumes, the aim of which is to supply a complete account of learning, either in general or of a specific branch of knowledge.

Denis Diderot, (1713–84)



"It suffices to read some of the analyses of the current dictionaries and encyclopedias (see, for instance, Weinreich 1980; Rey-Debove 1971) to realize that, if so-called encyclopedias are in some way encyclopedic, so-called dictionaries are rather impoverished encyclopedias" (Eco, Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, Indiana University Press, 1986).