Difference between revisions of "Number words - an exception"

From Hull AWE
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Language)
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
One strange exception to the rule given at [[Number words]] is the word '''number''' itself.  We say '''a number of points <u>have</u> been made''', not '''<strike>has</strike>''' been made, and '''a number of people <u>were</u> present''', not '''<strike>was</strike>''' – although the [[Subject]] of the [[verb (word class)|verb]] is singular – "<u>a</u> number”, in both cases.  Another exception that feels perfectly idiomatic to a native is "The staff '''were''' also responsible for…" where a logical user of the language might prefer "The staff '''<strike>was</strike>''' responsible…"
+
One strange exception to the rule given at [[Number words]] is the word '''number''' itself.  We say "'''A number of points <u>have</u> been made'''", not "'''<strike>has</strike>''' been made", and "'''A number of people <u>were</u> present'''", not "'''<strike>was</strike>'''" - although the [[Subject]] of the [[verb (word class)|verb]] is singular - "<u>a</u> number" - in both cases.  Another exception that feels perfectly idiomatic to a native is "The staff '''were''' also responsible for ... " where a logical user of the language might prefer "The staff '''<strike>was</strike>''' responsible".
  
Numeral words like '''million''' and '''hundred''' are followed by a singular in modern English.  Say '''three million''' or '''five hundred''', even if you think – rightly – that logically it should be '''<strike>three million<u>s</u></strike>''' and '''<strike>five hundred<u>s</u></strike>'''.  Human language is often not logical.  (In older English, you will sometimes see these words used in their plural forms.)
+
Numeral words like '''million''' and '''hundred''' are followed by a singular in modern English.  Say '''three million''' or '''five hundred''', even if you think - rightly - that logically it should be '''<strike>three million<u>s</u></strike>''' and '''<strike>five hundred<u>s</u></strike>'''.  Human language is often not logical.  (In older English, you will sometimes see these words used in their plural forms.)
  
 
[[Category:Usage]]
 
[[Category:Usage]]
 
[[Category:Grammar]]
 
[[Category:Grammar]]
 
[[Category:Academic English]]
 
[[Category:Academic English]]

Latest revision as of 10:04, 25 August 2015

One strange exception to the rule given at Number words is the word number itself. We say "A number of points have been made", not "has been made", and "A number of people were present", not "was" - although the Subject of the verb is singular - "a number" - in both cases. Another exception that feels perfectly idiomatic to a native is "The staff were also responsible for ... " where a logical user of the language might prefer "The staff was responsible".

Numeral words like million and hundred are followed by a singular in modern English. Say three million or five hundred, even if you think - rightly - that logically it should be three millions and five hundreds. Human language is often not logical. (In older English, you will sometimes see these words used in their plural forms.)