Difference between revisions of "Paradox"

From Hull AWE
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
''(This page forms part of a Course in Figures of Speech.  You can find an introduction to it at [[Figures of Speech course]].  '''Paradox''', however, is less of a [[Figures of speech|Figure of speech]] than a nobsvation about the strange nature of life, and the phenomena it shows usYou may have accessed this page from another page on a particular example, or by a direct search.)''
+
{{fos-mean}}
 +
'''Paradox''' is the linking of two apparently contradictory ideas.  (If we are more concerned with the words than the ideas which they express, we call it oxymoron.) Wordsworth, for example, wrote “The Child is father of the Man”, although the normal literal use of words insists that a child’s father is a man; but of course there is a real meaning intended.  (Our adult selves are formed by our childhood lives.)
  
 +
'''Paradox''' and [[oxymoron]] can be hard to distinguish.  As a rule of thumb, I would suggest that when a writer is deliberately trying to make an effect by contrast, it is an '''oxymoron'''; but if a contradiction exists in real life to which the writer is drawing attention, then it should be called a '''paradox'''.  This is not, of course, true where a writer deliberately chooses to make paradoxes, and calls them by that name.
  
Paradox is the linking of two apparently contradictory ideas.  (If we are more concerned with the words than the ideas which they express, we call it oxymoron.)  Wordsworth, for example, wrote “The Child is father of the Man”, although the normal literal use of words insists that a child’s father is a man; but of course there is a real meaning intended.  (Our adult selves are formed by our childhood lives.)
+
(In older times, '''paradox''' often meant an idea that was hard to believe, or that went against the orthodox viewIn 1616, it was defined as: "an opinion maintained contrary to the common allowed opinion, as if one affirm that the earth doth move round, and the heavens stand still." (Bullokar, cited in ''[[OED]]''; spelling modernised for AWE.))
 
+
'''Paradox''' and [[oxymoron]] can be hard to distinguishAs a rule of thumb, I would suggest that when a writer is deliberately trying to make an effect by contrast, it is an '''oxymoron'''; but if a contradiction exists in real life to which the writer is drawing attention, then it should be called a '''paradox'''. This is not, of course, true where a writer deliberately chooses to make paradoxes, and calls them by that name.
+
  
(In older times, '''paradox''' often meant an idea that was hard to believe, or that went against the orthodox view.  In 1616, it was defined as: "an opinion maintained contrary to the common allowed opinion, as if one affirm that the earth doth move round, and the heavens stand still." (Bullokar, cited in ''OED''; spelling modernised for AWE.))
 
 
[[category:figures]] [[category:Figures of Speech course]]
 
[[category:figures]] [[category:Figures of Speech course]]

Revision as of 17:42, 5 July 2007

This article is part of the Figures of Speech course. You may choose to follow it in a structured way, or read each item separately.

Paradox is the linking of two apparently contradictory ideas. (If we are more concerned with the words than the ideas which they express, we call it oxymoron.) Wordsworth, for example, wrote “The Child is father of the Man”, although the normal literal use of words insists that a child’s father is a man; but of course there is a real meaning intended. (Our adult selves are formed by our childhood lives.)

Paradox and oxymoron can be hard to distinguish. As a rule of thumb, I would suggest that when a writer is deliberately trying to make an effect by contrast, it is an oxymoron; but if a contradiction exists in real life to which the writer is drawing attention, then it should be called a paradox. This is not, of course, true where a writer deliberately chooses to make paradoxes, and calls them by that name.

(In older times, paradox often meant an idea that was hard to believe, or that went against the orthodox view. In 1616, it was defined as: "an opinion maintained contrary to the common allowed opinion, as if one affirm that the earth doth move round, and the heavens stand still." (Bullokar, cited in OED; spelling modernised for AWE.))